prometeu-studio/docs/studio/agendas/01.3. Asset Details, Diagnostics, and Action Surface Agenda.md

Asset Details, Diagnostics, and Action Surface Agenda

Status

Open

Purpose

Define what the selected asset view shows and which actions are directly available there.

Domain Owner

docs/studio

Current Code Context

The packer service model already expects:

• structured diagnostics,
• preview/apply mutation flows,
• operations such as register_asset, adopt_asset, forget_asset, remove_asset, doctor, and build.

The selected asset view should therefore be designed around explicit state and explicit actions.

Core Questions

1. What summary information is always visible for the selected asset?
2. Which diagnostics belong inline versus in a separate panel?
3. Which actions should be primary, secondary, or hidden behind confirmation?
4. How should managed and orphan assets differ visually?
5. How should runtime-facing information such as preload and output format appear?

Recommendation

Baseline direction:

• a summary card for identity and state,
• explicit diagnostics panel,
• explicit action group,
• clear differentiation between safe actions and sensitive mutations,
• no hidden automatic repair behavior.

Expected Follow-up

• a decision on asset details composition,
• a spec for diagnostics and actions in the workspace,
• a plan for Studio service integration in the asset details view.