# PR-07e Assets Refactor Cleanup and Regression Coverage

Domain owner: `docs/studio`

## Briefing

Consolidate the refactor by removing obsolete redraw-heavy code paths, tightening naming, and locking the event-driven behavior with tests.

## Objective

Finish the corrective refactor so the codebase does not drift back toward monolithic render ownership.

After this PR:

- obsolete redraw-request and monolithic render helpers are removed;
- remaining component boundaries are clearer and easier to maintain;
- tests guard lifecycle, event routing, and selective-update behavior;
- the workspace code is organized around durable responsibilities rather than incremental leftovers.
- the resulting framework is left in a shape that other Studio workspaces can adopt directly.

## Dependencies

- [`./PR-07a-assets-event-topology-and-lifecycle-foundation.md`](./PR-07a-assets-event-topology-and-lifecycle-foundation.md)
- [`./PR-07b-asset-navigator-and-row-subscriptions.md`](./PR-07b-asset-navigator-and-row-subscriptions.md)
- [`./PR-07c-asset-details-and-form-lifecycle.md`](./PR-07c-asset-details-and-form-lifecycle.md)
- [`./PR-07d-asset-mutation-and-structural-sync-orchestration.md`](./PR-07d-asset-mutation-and-structural-sync-orchestration.md)

## Scope

- remove dead or transitional redraw-oriented code
- rename classes/events where the old naming reflects the wrong direction
- tighten package structure for navigator, details, and orchestration code
- make reusable framework pieces visible and discoverable to future workspace implementations
- add regression coverage for:
  - lifecycle subscription hygiene
  - selection propagation
  - row patch propagation
  - details-local updates
  - structural sync boundaries
- update Studio learn/spec material if the refactor exposes terminology drift

## Non-Goals

- no new user-facing asset features in this slice
- no speculative refactor outside the `Assets` workspace and its direct event contracts

## Execution Method

1. Remove compatibility layers that existed only to bridge from the old refresh-heavy implementation.
2. Normalize class and event naming around lifecycle and event-driven ownership.
3. Reorganize tests to reflect component boundaries instead of one giant workspace class.
4. Update documentation to reflect the stabilized architecture.

## Acceptance Criteria

- the refactored `Assets` workspace no longer depends on redraw-request events as a primary mechanism
- code ownership is split along navigator, details, and orchestration boundaries
- lifecycle and event-driven behavior are covered by focused tests
- the remaining `AssetWorkspace` root is materially smaller and primarily compositional
- the reusable framework surface is clear enough for other workspaces to consume instead of cloning `Assets` internals

## Validation

- full unit-test pass for asset-workspace packages
- targeted regression tests for mount/unmount lifecycle safety
- targeted regression tests proving that local updates stay local unless structural sync is requested

## Affected Artifacts

- `prometeu-studio/src/main/java/p/studio/workspaces/assets/...`
- `prometeu-studio/src/main/java/p/studio/events/...`
- `prometeu-studio/src/test/java/p/studio/workspaces/assets/...`
- `docs/studio/specs/4. Assets Workspace Specification.md`
- `docs/studio/learn/mental-model-assets-workspace.md`